Maji Yaw Htung (2005)
Abstract
Seven hybrids cherry tomatoes
together with an open-pollinated variety CH 154 as check evaluated for yield
and yield components, agronomic characters and organoleptic test under Nakhon Pathom , Thailand conditions. TX4003, TX4008
and TX4009 were better than CH145 and other lines in terms of marketable yield,
average fruits weight, and number of fruits per plant, percent marketable yield
by fruit weight and by fruit number. The acceptability of line 4B4141 in terms
of taste was better than CH 154 and also the best among the lines in
organoleptic test, brix and fruit firmness.
Introduction
Tomato (Lycopersicon
esculentum) is native to the Andes mountain
of South America , where it was used
long before Columbus .
It was taken to Europe where it was a popular
vegetable by the 1500s. The tomato did not gain wide acceptance in the United States
until the mid 1800s. Tomatoes are warm season crop and tomato does not thrive
in cold weather and will not set fruit at temperatures below 14.4oC. Tomato
should be grown where they will receive at least 6 hr of direct sunlight and it
does not set fruit above 29.4o C. Most Lycopersicon related species, namely L. hirsutum, L. peruvianum and L.
pimpinellifolium
.
.
Some other markets trained tomatoes are quoted separately as
“trellis” and two plants of training are followed. One calls for a stake 1.5 m or 2 m long driven into the
ground beside each plant and plants are tied to the stake every 30 cm or so. In
many regions, little damage is done to tomatoes by insects and diseases at the
same time; the total number of enemies encountered in various regions is large.
According the diseases fusarium wilt, leaf spots and, the late blight of
potatoes, bacterial canker, Verticillium wilt. There are some other diseases
these can effect the yield those are bacterial spot, bacterial wilt, early
blight leaf mold and powdery mildew (4).
There are hundreds of tomato
cultivars available. Fruits come in a number of shapes, sizes, and colors such
as main crop cultivars, orange or yellow fruit cultivars, container cultivars,
paste cultivars and cherry tomato or salad tomatoes.
Cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme), so called salad tomato,
is the probable ancestor of the cultivated tomato. It varies in size up to 3.5
cm in diameter. The fruit is yellow or red. It has good source of vitamins, minerals
and has high sugar content. Cherry tomato became popular because of its good
taste and beautiful shape as well as a cash crop. In some Asian countries,
cherry tomato is still a new crop which needs to be evaluated for adaptation.
One of the components of the tomato
breeding program of AVRDC is the development of cherry tomato lines for
evaluation. One open-pollinated cherry tomato line, CH154, was released as a
variety in Thailand .
New lines and experimental hybrids have been developed not only by AVRDC but
also by tomato breeders in the country. A number of these lines/hybrids are
available for evaluation. It is the purpose of this trial to evaluate promising
experimental hybrids of cherry tomato under Nakhon Pathom ,
Thailand conditions to
determine if any of these hybrids will be better than the existing varieties
grown in Thailand .
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted at AVRDC-ARC
Kasetsart University ,
Kamphaeng Sean, Nakhon Pathom ,
Thailand from
December 2005 to March 2006. Seven F1 hybrids of cherry tomato lines those are
TX1001, TX1002, TX4007, TX4008, TX4009, 4B4141 and one open-pollinated variety
CH 145 (check) as check were used to be evaluated.
Plastic seedling flats were filled
with 1:1:1 mixture of coconut husk, compost and rice hall. The seeds were sown
on 8 November 2005. Thinning was done one week after sowing by leaving one
seedling/pot. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with three replications and
1.6 x 5 m2 plot size consisting of 2 rows/plot and 10 plants/row. The plots
were mulched with polyethylene sheets before transplanting. The seedlings were
transplanted on 7 December 2005. Complete fertilizer (15-15-15) was applied as
side dressing at the rate of 187.5 kg/ha 35 days after transplanting. The
seedlings were furrowed-irrigated immediately after transplanting and weekly
thereafter depending on the soil moisture level. Bamboo sticks were used as
trellis two weeks after transplanting. The plots were weeded twice on 5 and 28
January 2006, respectively. To control inset pests and diseases, insecticides
and fungicides were sprayed at recommended rate depending on severity of
infection/infestation. Harvesting was done twice a week from January to March
2006.
The data were collected based on
plant stand, growth habit, days to first harvest, total yield, marketable yield
and fruit number (big and insect-damaged) non-marketable yield and fruit
number(crack and small), mean fruit weight, fruits peer cluster, fruit color,
firmness, brix, fruit shape, fruit shoulder, and fresh fruit acceptability. The
data were analyzed statistically using MASTAT C software.
Result and Discussion
Yield
and yield components
Result of analysis of variance showed that average fruits per
cluster was significant, mean fruit weight, percent marketable yield by weight
and by number were highly significant while total yield, marketable yield and
number of fruits per plant were not significantly different ( table 1). The
average fruits setting of 4B4141 and TX4009 was better than CH 154 and among them
4B4141 was the best fruit-set. Total fruit number of TX4003 and TX4008 was
higher than and of the lines and CH 154.
According to the table, total yield
was not significant but the total yield of TX4002, TX4003 and TX4009 were
differently higher than among the lines. The percent marketable yield by weight
of TX4003, TX4008, and TX4009 were significantly higher than among the lines
and CH154. The fruits number of percent marketable yield of TX4003, TX4007,
TX4008, TX4009 were high significantly different from other lines and Ch 154.
TX4003, TX4008 and TX4009 were
highly significantly different from CH154 in average fruits per cluster, fruits
number of plant, total marketable yield, and percent marketable yield by weight
and percent marketable yield by number.
Table 1.Yield and yield component of
8 cherry tomato lines in areplicated yield trial.
|
|||||||
AVRDC-ARC,
|
|||||||
November 2005 to March 2006
|
|||||||
Total
|
Total
|
Average
|
No.of
|
Mean
|
Percent
|
Percent
|
|
Variety
|
Mark.
|
Yield
|
Fruits
|
Fruits
|
Fruit
|
Mark.
|
Mark
|
Yield
|
(t/ha)
|
per
|
per
|
Weight
|
yield
|
yield
|
|
(t/ha)
|
Cluster
|
plant
|
(g)
|
By Wt.
|
By No.
|
||
TX4009
|
47.2
|
49.6
|
8.09ab
|
178.7
|
8.51c
|
93.7a
|
88.4a
|
TX4003
|
43.3
|
46.2
|
7.63abc
|
183.6
|
10.1b
|
93.6a
|
89.1a
|
TX4002
|
37.5
|
46.5
|
7.25bc
|
156
|
11.9a
|
80.7b
|
78.6bc
|
TX4007
|
35.4
|
40.4
|
7.05c
|
146.3
|
7.09c
|
87.4ab
|
84.7ab
|
TX4008
|
34.8
|
37.6
|
7.92abc
|
211.7
|
8.04c
|
92.7a
|
90.7a
|
CH154(check)
|
30.9
|
36.1
|
7.88abc
|
180.7
|
8.2c
|
85.6ab
|
78.4bc
|
TX4001
|
29.9
|
34.5
|
7.29bc
|
169.3
|
7.89c
|
86.6ab
|
76.9bc
|
4B4141
|
27.1
|
33.8
|
8.29a
|
170.7
|
9.08
|
97.8b
|
71.2c
|
Mean
|
35.8
|
40.6
|
7.6
|
174.6
|
**
|
87.5
|
82.25
|
F-test
|
ns
|
ns
|
*
|
ns
|
7.23
|
**
|
**
|
C.V
|
26.07
|
24.27
|
5.86
|
15.17
|
3.45
|
3.98
|
|
Mean followed by the same letter(s)
in a colum are not significantly at 5% level by
|
|||||||
DMRT. ns=non significant, * =
significant at 5% level and ** = highly significant
|
|||||||
at 1% level.
|
Agronomic character
The normal plant growth habit of cherry tomato is indeterminate
except for TX4002 and TX4007 which are semi-determinate. TX4001, TX4002, TX4003
and TX4007 were the earliest to reach 50% flowering at about 25 days from
transplanting. The earliest of lines to be harvested are TX4001, TX4002, TX4003
and TX4007 as 56 days for each.
The fruits shape of TX4002, TX4008
and TX4009 are globe shape and others are oblong shape including CH154, and
then all the lines and CH 154 fruits shoulder are green. From the Royal
Horticulture Society color chart TX4001, 4B4141 and Ch 154 are orange-red and
TX4002, TX4003, TX4007, and TX4009 are red.
Organoleptic test, Brix and
Fruit Firmness
The acceptability of tastes is
color, appearance, taste and sweetness. The most acceptance line is 4B4141. But
the acceptability of TX4003, TX4008 and TX4009 were available. The highest brix
level was observed in 4B4141 and TX4001 which were better than of CH154, however,
the brix values were not significantly different. 4B4141 has the most firm
skin, was higher than other lines and CH 154.
Conclusion
All of hybrid cherry tomato lines and check cherry tomato variety
showed promising result under Kamphaeng Sean condition. Among the hybrid lines
TX4003, TX4008 and TX4009 were better than CH154 and other lines and check in
terms of average fruits of cluster, fruits number, total marketable yield,
percent marketable yield by weight and percent marketable yield by number.
Particularly the acceptability taste of 4B4141 line was better than CH154 and
also the best among the lines in organoleptic test, brix and fruit firmness.
Acknowledgements
I am extremely thankful to the
organization of American (101) Veterans, Inc. Project Old Soldier, Mr. Peter
Lutken (Head of 101 Project Old Soldier) and Dr. Ed Runge (Technical Advisor of
101 Project Old Soldier) for the providing of sponsorship. Moreover, I would
like to mention to Mrs. Nang Ja (Superintendent of Project Old Soldier in Myanmar )
for her decision to send me to be able to attend this training. Sincerely
thanks go to Mr. Efren C. Altoveros (Training Officer) who was undertaking
patiently for this guidance and supervision during the training course. I also
appreciate and thank to Ms. Somchit Preongwitayakun, Mr. Worawit Sorajjapinun,
Ms. Chanida Ammaranan, all AVRDC and TRC staffs and farm staff for their kind
help and work hard during the training course and throughout the experiments
period.
References
1.
AVRDC. 1989. Tomato and pepper
production in the tropics. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on
Integrated Management Practices. 21-26 March 1988. Asian Vegetable Research and
Development Center ,
Tainan , Taiwan . Pp. 2, 14, 70.
2.
Splittstoesser, W.E. 1984.
Vegetable Growing Handbook, The AVI Publishing Company, Inc. Westport , Connecticut .
Pp. 272-275.
3.
Work, P. and J. Carew. 1995.
Vegetable Production and Marketing, Wiley Eastern Private Limited: New Delhi . Pp. 325-335.
4.
AVRDC.1990. Vegetable
production training manual. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center .
Shanhua, Tainan .
Pp. 277-280.
Vong Hiep Long. 1998. Cherry tomato varietal
trial. In: ARC Training Report. AVRDC-ARC.
No comments:
Post a Comment